Comparing Barak Obamas Administration to Abraham...

Over time there has been alot of presidents that has been in and out of the white house. Some of the presidents have done a great job in office some presidents didnt do so good in the white house. People in general have all sorts of different opinions on presidents some people may say one president was the best while another person may disagree. In my opinion out of all the presidents there is a man named Abraham Lincoln who i think was one of the greatest presidents of all time. One of are presidents in the present who i think does not do a very good job in office is president Barack Obama. There are a lot of reasons why i put these two in the catogories i did and in my essay i am going to explain this reasoning behind my†¦show more content†¦Abraham Lincoln was not perfect but he was a great president. President Obama in my opinion is one of the worst presidents to ever step in office. Obama who was born in born August 4, 1961, he is the 44th and current president of the United States. Obama in my opinion cant keep the promises that he makes. Obama promised to keep the unemployment rate under 8% and making it seem a failure though the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said it saved more than 3 million jobs and prevented a double-digit jobless rate. Obama is forcing americans to have health care not all americans can afford healthcare. They also voted on the Obamacare and people hated it but we ended up being forced to get it anyway and for the people that cant afford it get punished by having to pay a fine for not having it. Obama is not a strong leader at all he has driven us so far in debt that it is unreal. To me obama doesnt seem devoted at all how can you make a health care plan and pretty much tell people if there over 75 there just out of luck for health care in my opi nion that is sad. Obama does not take credit for his actions , when he fails to keep his promises he points the finge at somebody else instead of taking responsibility for it. When the United States went into a goverment shut down instead of Obama and standing up and being a leader and figuring out a solution the shut down continued for

Hitler Able to Establish a Dictatorship Free Essays

Was Hitler Able to Establish a Dictatorship Because He Banned Other Political Parties? BY 002910 â€Å"Hitler was able to establish a dictatorship because he banned other political parties†. Do you agree? Explain your answer. The rise of Hitler as a dictator was one Involving many deferent factors. We will write a custom essay sample on Hitler Able to Establish a Dictatorship or any similar topic only for you Order Now The political parties caused him a very challenging problem, and by banning them it undoubtedly helped him secure all-out rule. But was It the only reason why Hitler managed to establish himself as a dictator, and If not, Is It the main one? Hitler knew that the many opposition parties would pose him ND his government a real threat. He Instantly acted against them by getting Hindering to pass a decree stating they had to be Informed 48 hours In advance If a political meeting was to be held. This let Hitler take control of his political surroundings as It meant he would know when and where to go to break up a political meeting. It gave the Mans a strong foothold In the election that was approaching and a good starting point to establishing his dictatorship as he was already limiting what others could do and was getting his way. However, he only got 4% of the vote at the election. With other political parties still around to vote for Hitler could never have had a dictatorship as he did not have a mandate to rule. Therefore, eradicating the other parties would appear to be how he became a dictator. We must consider what it is to be a dictator, and with any sort of political opponent around a dictatorship is implausible to establish. First, all choice of opinion must be taken away. In this way, banning political parties has to be a good reason why Hitler managed to become Germany’s all out ruler. On top of this clear idea that e could never have absolute power with political parties still around is the fact that the Enabling Act, which to an extent was the blockage of power for any other party, really sealed Hitter’s position as Germany’s next dictator. What he said now became law, and he could do whatever he wanted as long as it didn’t anger Hindering, the Industrialists or the Army too much. In this sense, it looks like when Hitler finally banned the formation of political parties on 14th July it was this that gave him the status as a dictator of Germany . He made the laws, and there was no other view to go against his. However, we must look at the other reasons why Hitler secured this power. By no means was banning political parties the only reason why he became an all-out ruler. Even if he had banned the political parties, without the support of the other groups which got him into power he wouldn’t last long as Chancellor. The Night of the Long Knives is one of the main reasons why he became a dictator as It kept on side those who had the power to overthrow him. Room’s proposals to take over all German businesses did not sit well with the Industrialists as they would lose all their rower, money and influence. He also wanted to merge the Army Into the S. A. , onto popular move with the Army generals. By choosing to arrest and kill Room Hitler made sure that he held onto power; without sling with these groups they could well have forced Hindering to sack him as Chancellor. But by choosing the Army and Industrialists over his own party he showed that, although there were no longer any political parties, Hitler was still not the dictator of Germany as he was being forced to but did still have outside factions to impress. Therefore, it was also the death of Hindering and the oath by the Army which made Hitler the dictator of Germany. With no one above him to get rid of him, Hitler could then declare himself F;here and make the Army swear an oath to defend him. Now the outside groups had no one to complain to if they didn’t like what was going on. They were also now bound to follow him; the Army had to give their lives to him, which meant no threat of any military coup, and the Industrialists could not speak out against him as they could be arrested and sent to concentration camps. Yes, the banning of political parties gave Hitler the opportunity to declare himself ruler, but that opportunity could have been taken away if he hadn’t managed to keep them onside throughout. Hindering could still have been pressured into sacking Hitler as Chancellor (he had done this to others many times before in the previous years), thus stopping Hitler getting the chance to become supreme ruler all together. As well as this, Just banning political parties would never have been enough to become a dictator due to one very obvious blockage; the Reichstag. With it still in the country the country was still democratic as the parties had a say in how the country was run. Hitler could not ban any political parties without getting rid of the Reichstag first. It was this that the Enabling Act actually got rid of so that Hitler could start to rule the country on his own. It was not actually the banning of political parties in Germany that set in motion the wheels of dictatorship but the demolition of democracy and the Whimper constitution. But at the same time this could also be seen as a reason why the banning of political parties as the reason why Hitler established himself as F;here. In reality, the Reichstag is made up of political parties, so getting rid of it could be seen as getting rid of the parties. This could be both for and against the statement in the question, but I believe that the Reichstag has to be treated as a separate thing. In conclusion, I think that although Germany’s political parties did pose a major problem to Hitler and that banning it did help him to become a dictator, by no means is it the sole reason why he became one. Really, the Night of the Long Knives is more important as it is the point when everything could have collapsed for the Nazis. The start of Hitter’s rule was all about pleasing those around him and trying to stay in power. Therefore, keeping the Army and Industrialists on side at this point was key to making sure he lasted out Hinderers life. The Reichstag is a mixture of both sides of the argument, but it still backs up the point that banning political parties was not the only reason why Hitler became a dictator and isn’t the main reason why either. How to cite Hitler Able to Establish a Dictatorship, Papers

Opinion On Death Penalty Essay Example For Students

Opinion On Death Penalty Essay Death by execution has existed as a punishment since the dawn of time.Yet although this has existed seemingly forever, the question of its morality has also existed for that same amount of time.Killers kill innocent people, there is no question about that, but does that give us the right to kill these killers? I do not think so. Racism is often the driving force behind crime.Yet in a justice system that preaches equality, it too is led by racism.There is a pattern of evidence indicating racial disparities in the charging, sentencing, and imposition of the death penalty according to a 1990 U.S. Government report.An overwhelming majority of death row defendants since 1977 were executed for killing whites despite the fact that whites and blacks are victims of murder in approximately equal numbers.In Texas, for example, blacks found guilty of killing whites were found to be six times more likely to receive the death penalty that whites convicted of killing whites.Of the 3,061 inmates on death row 1,246 of them are black, making 40% of death row inmates black.Compare this to the fact that blacks make up 12% of the U.S. population. Furthermore, many black prisoners on death row were sentenced to death by all-white juries after prosecutors had deliberately excluded black people from the jury pool. We will write a custom essay on Opinion On Death Penalty specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Racism alone is not the only problem with Capital Punishment.Many inmates on death row suffer from mental retardation.The 1984 ECOSOC safeguards state that the death penalty must not be carried out on persons who have become insane, while the ECOSOC resolution 1989/64 on the execution of the 1984 safeguards recommends that UN member states eliminate the death penalty for persons suffering from mental retardation or extremely limited competence. Amnesty International has documented the cases of more than 50 prisoners suffering from mental illness or mental retardation who have been executed in the U.S. in the past decade.Humanitarian standards maintain that mentally impaired people should not be held criminally responsible for their acts.The prohibition against executing insane recognizes that killing people who cannot comprehend the nature or purpose of their punishment is not a deterrent or retribution.Despite all this the mentally ill are still being executed. Innocent people will be killed if the death penalty is kept in the same way that it is used today.Three hundred fifty people convicted of capital crimes in the U.S. between 1900 and 1985 were innocent of the crimes charged, according to a 1987 study.Some prisoners escaped execution by minutes, but 23 were not so lucky and found innocent of their crimes after they had been put to death. A U.S. Congressional report by the House Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights in October 1993 listed 48 condemned men who had been freed from death row since 1972.The report blamed inadequate legal safeguards to prevent wrongful executions and listed numerous built-in flaws in the criminal justice system.The report concluded: Judging by past experience, a substantial number of death row inmates are indeed innocent, and there is a high risk that some of them will be executed. The death penalty violates the right to life, and subjects the prisoner to the ultimate form of cruel, inhumane or degrading punishment which goes against the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Declaration, adopted by the United Nations in 1948, proclaims each persons right to protection from deprivation of life, and it also states that no one shall be subjected to cruel or degrading punishment.The pre-meditated and cold-blooded killing of prisoners in state custody violates these rights.Over half the worlds countries have abolished in law or practice capital punishment.43 nations have abolished the death penalty since 1976, the year it was reinstated in the U.S., placing us among such bastions of fairness and justice as Iran and China. .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052 , .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052 .postImageUrl , .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052 , .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052:hover , .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052:visited , .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052:active { border:0!important; } .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052:active , .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052 .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ucd4c2e87240790c66ecce2fa7ed5b052:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Missionaries and Education in Bengal EssayThe new evangelization calls for followers of Christ who are unconditionally pro-life: who will proclaim, celebrate and serve the Gospel of life in every situation.A sign of hope is the increasing recognition that the dignity of human life must never be taken away, even in the case of someone who has done great evil.Modern society has the means of protecting itself, without definitively denying criminals the chance to reform.I renew the appeal I made most recently at Christmas for a consensus to end the death penalty, which is both cruel and unnecessary. -Pope John Paul II, January 27, 1999, St. LouisThe death penalty which violates these rights cannot be justified as a necessary public safety measure because detailed research, both in the U.S. and other countries, has produced no evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than other punishments.This is not surprising, most persons who murder are not thinking rationally when they commit the crime.The threat of execution at some future date does not enter the minds of killers acting under of drugs and/or alcohol, in the grip of fear or rage, or while panicking during the commission of another crime. Personally I feel that the death penalty is an immoral act of legislature which does not take into account the prejudices of the people who enforce the law.Racism exists along with the execution of the innocent and mentally retarded.This inhumane act serves the same purpose as life in jail but at a much greater cost.We should spend more money on crime prevention than the enforcement of punishments.